Did you know that classical music, a term often evoking images of grand symphonies and skilled orchestras, represents a profoundly diverse genre that spans over a millennium? From the sacred choral works of the Renaissance to the contemporary compositions of avant-garde artists, the characteristics and definitions of classical music are more complex than they may seem. Today, the relevance of classical music is in question, mired in discussions about diversity, historical significance, and its place in modern culture. This article aims not only to explore the intricate nature of classical music but also to challenge prevailing notions surrounding its definition.
What makes classical music relevant to today’s society, and how can we redefine our understanding to be more inclusive and reflective of diverse voices within the genre? Delving into the concept of "written music" as a shared creative process reveals a pivotal answer—one that moves beyond merely defining a sound and embraces an ethos of musical expression that connects composers across time and genres.
When one thinks of classical music, imagery of composers like Beethoven, Bach, and Mozart often comes to mind. However, these icons represent just a fraction of a more expansive tradition that includes a multitude of styles, historical contexts, and innovations. According to Matthew Aucoin, a composer and conductor, “the sheer abundance of the tradition might invite the conclusion that trying to define it at all is a hopeless exercise.” Nevertheless, a closer examination reveals that the answer may lie less in sound and more in the artistic practices that underscore the creation of what we term classical music.
Indeed, classical music does not sound a specific way; rather, it is identified through the practice of composition, where written scores serve as the cornerstone of musical expression. This attribute fundamentally separates classical music from other genres that often prioritize oral traditions and spontaneous performances. The evolution of music notation over the centuries has been instrumental in shaping the vocabulary of classical compositions, allowing complex ideas and structures to be captured and communicated.
To appreciate the distinction made by written music, we must recognize its historical significance. Musical notation dates back hundreds of years, originating primarily to serve religious sanctuaries where music was an integral part of worship. This formalized structure allowed for a more intricate development, transformation, and preservation of musical ideas. During the Renaissance and Baroque periods, composers began to craft elaborate works requiring orchestral arrangements, giving rise to the modern symphony orchestra.
The availability of printed music in the 19th century greatly democratized access, enabling music lovers and musicians to engage with compositions more intimately. This shift was significant in creating a culture where music was not solely performed but could be shared, studied, and celebrated through written form. However, the emergence of sound recording technology in the late 19th and early 20th centuries fundamentally altered the landscape of music consumption, shifting the authoritative source of musical experience from the written score to recorded performances.
Recordings of music reshaped listeners’ relationships with classical compositions. Listeners who once gathered around the piano to perform pieces together found themselves passive, consuming music rather than engaging with it actively. As Aucoin notes, “because a musician no longer had to be literate to gain worldwide acclaim, the technology had the collateral effect of sidelining musical literacy.”
Such accessibility led to the rise of oral traditions dominating popular music, where brevity and memorization were preferred. Four-minute songs became the norm, eclipsing the more complex and lengthy symphonic works. This cultural prioritization of temporary over tangible forms of music inadvertently diminished the appreciation for traditional composition practices.
At its essence, classical music is defined through its reliance on written scores, a practice that emphasizes a structured creative process. This is unlike genres such as jazz or pop, where the studio album, live performance, or oral transmission dominate the narrative. For instance, while jazz holds unique spontaneity celebrated in live performances, classical music insists on the integrity of the written score.
This point is illustrated effectively in the works of acclaimed jazz artists like Duke Ellington and Billy Strayhorn, whose meticulously notated big-band pieces share a compositional kinship with symphonic works by icons like Igor Stravinsky or Aaron Copland. Both groups operate within a framework that values notated instruction, elevating the act of creation to a complex art form that interweaves various influences, styles, and cultural narratives.
As we consider classical music's future, advocating for musical literacy becomes crucial. Offering access to music education fosters creativity and self-expression, enabling and empowering individuals to explore their musical identities. If we treat written music as a tool for creativity rather than elitism, we can inspire new generations to redefine and expand the boundaries of what classical music embodies.
Despite the challenge of integrating diverse voices into a historical canon dominated by a handful of recognized composers, embracing written music's expansive nature opens the door to new interpretations and influences. It allows individuals from varied backgrounds to make their mark on a tradition that, at its core, celebrates the act of creation.
In recent years, the conversation around classical music has been propelled by discussions about diversity and representation. Organizations and institutions that have long relied on the legacies of primarily white European composers are facing scrutiny. The question emerges: "What is classical music, and who is it meant for?" As financial viability of orchestras and music institutions increasingly hangs in the balance, these discussions have profound implications not only for the genre's future but also for the definition of culture itself.
A reassessment of what classical music represents must consider whose narratives are being performed and whose are relegated to the margins. Labels such as "Eurocentrism" and "elitism" have sparked movements to include voices from underrepresented communities in the orchestral space, further bridging the gap between tradition and contemporary expressions. The efforts to highlight composers from diverse backgrounds signify an essential recalibration of the classical music narrative, allowing for a wider range of interpretations and personal connections with the genre.
To address these issues, initiatives aimed at increasing access to music education should be prioritized. Creating programs that provide access to notation literacy and composition workshops in underfunded communities can nurture new talents and expand the diversity of voices producing classical music today. This shift not only challenges the established norms but also enriches the cultural fabric that classical music represents.
In the midst of this paradigm shift, perhaps the most pivotal call to action is a deepened understanding of listening. As Aucoin astutely observes, “If we understand that writing, in music as in language, has the potential to be a force for liberation... we might come to a fuller sense of what music can be in our lives—the many forms it can take, the many truths it can tell.”
To truly engage with classical music means embracing it as a living, breathing tradition—one that adapts to societal changes while maintaining its foundational emphasis on composition and written music. This process involves listening with openness to diverse expressions, enhancing one’s appreciation for the richness of musical storytelling.
Ultimately, while classical music may not fit neatly into a single definition or category, by celebrating its core tenet of composition and expanding the inclusivity of its narrative, we allow for innovative interpretations that honor its legacy while invigorating its relevance. Classical music thrives in that space—where history meets contemporary expression, where scores can tell stories of diverse identities, and where the act of listening encourages a shared journey into the rhythms and textures of our collective human experience.
Classical music refers to a broad range of musical styles and genres created predominantly in Western traditions over a span of more than 1,000 years, characterized by the use of written scores.
Rather than sound alone, classical music is identified by its reliance on composition and the preservation of music through written notation, distinguishing it from genres that prioritize oral traditions.
Musical literacy empowers individuals to engage with music as creators, broadening opportunities for self-expression and ensuring diverse voices contribute to the ongoing narrative of classical music.
By embracing diverse influences, expanding educational access, and promoting inclusivity, classical music can adapt and resonate with contemporary audiences while honoring its historical roots.
Ongoing discussions about diversity, financial sustainability, and the relevance of traditional compositions to modern audiences highlight challenges for classical music institutions today.
Engaging with music education, promoting diverse composers, and actively participating in discussions about equity in the arts all contribute to a more vibrant future for classical music.